x10000Better than Hillary!
I would agree, but I thought the repubs didnt have a chance in 04. (like not even close).I've been a republican all my life. Not pleased with what has gone on in the last couple years. I'm realistic in knowing that a republican isn't going to win the election this year... and I'm willing to give the other side a chance. And I'd rather have Obama than Godzillary.
Ralph Nader got 0.38 percent of the vote in 2004, and was not even close to being the factor he had previously been in 2000 (when he got something like 2 - 2.5 percent).i like hillary more than obama, and honestly i thought the dems had office in sight... but ralph nadar may have just fucked that all up so.
Those are my sentiments. I'm kind of upset Huckabee stayed in the race, forcing Romney out. I do not care for McCain much at all.I've been a republican all my life. Not pleased with what has gone on in the last couple years. I'm realistic in knowing that a republican isn't going to win the election this year... and I'm willing to give the other side a chance. And I'd rather have Obama than Godzillary.
And you complaint that politicians are cynical . . .Our country is heading for the shitter, and whoever is at the helm this next term isn't going to do piddly squat to change it... better for the dems to be in the limelight and take the blame.
thanks for the stats, i did honestly think it was more than that, but regardless of that the man is worth nothing but stealing votes from someone who may be a good candidate.Ralph Nader got 0.38 percent of the vote in 2004, and was not even close to being the factor he had previously been in 2000 (when he got something like 2 - 2.5 percent).
The Libertarian candidate for president got 0.34 percent in 2004.
If I took the trouble to get my name on all 50 state ballots (and that's a boat-load of work for a minor candidate), *I* could get 0.38 percent.
That's how irrelevant Nader is these days.
EDIT - Nader got 465,000 votes for 0.38 percent in 2004, after getting 2.89 million votes in 2000, for 2.7 percent.
Do not want.Any thoughts on the future president of the country?
![]()
All I have heard from Obama is hope and change. Hope for what? Change in what form?Any thoughts on the possible president of the country?
troof.All I have heard from Obama is hope and change. Hope for what? Change in what form?
Obama is nothing more than an empty suit.
Goodwill, and admiration, without substance = fail.
He has clearly laid out his intentions. You just haven't been listening.All I have heard from Obama is hope and change. Hope for what? Change in what form?
Obama is nothing more than an empty suit.
Goodwill, and admiration, without substance = fail.
nader won't put a dent in anything. All the other candidates have been campaigning for so long, I just think he's too late to the game this time for anyone to really take notice.i like hillary more than obama, and honestly i thought the dems had office in sight... but ralph nadar may have just fucked that all up so.
although i would normally agree, i would tend to think that even this late he will always have that core group of followers which could easily get him 1%...like greg said earlier...either one of us could do what it takes to get on the ballot and most likely get 1%, i just feel like that small a piece could come into place in 08.nader won't put a dent in anything. All the other candidates have been campaigning for so long, I just think he's too late to the game this time for anyone to really take notice.