i would like to participate. are there any rules pertaining to the number of ground straps you are required to use?
Bring Your Saab, I'll Bring My Saab.
Bring your RWD American Junk, I'll show up in a 440 Super Bee that does Wheel Stands.
Bring Your Beemer or Whatever you think a Road car is and i'll bring a Sierra Cosworth.
I GUARANTEE all those are REAL Carz. All of which i have Actually worked on ,Constructed Etc,.
Well, let's review...Since you question not only the ability to convert a N/A autoboxed C900 from stock to a 2.3, but also the fact of whether or not I have managed to accomplish this, I say we keep it all in the proper context as that is what is in dispute, what is the root of the contention.Well? Lets See your Saab? 75&80 What do you want to run with? A 9k with a 20g China Booster. or a 93 on Crack?
beat me to it.i would like to participate. are there any rules pertaining to the number of ground straps you are required to use?
Proof that being a ricer has nothing to do with what you drive. In times like these, I'm reminded of some words of wisdom from my spirit guide, Ja Rule:No, I am not a "ricer" as I have always owned only European vehicles with the exception of one(1) Subie and one(1) Honda, both of which I enjoyed only a brief partnership with, everything else, though, has been domestic and European.
That IS badass, no question, and considerably ingenious as well, but I've seen even more ingenuity exhibited in the Saab arena, particularly in the field of what had been touted as "can't be done" swaps, such as a V8 into a C900, and yet:![]()
This thing is way more fun then any autotragic c900. 2.3 or not.
I don't even know who those people are, but I'll try doing a search for posts by them, do a little reading up, and get back to you with an opinion if you'd like?i feel like this guy is raul and viggenluca combined into one.
Still interested in the answers to my questions above.As usual with these sort of posts, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt. Don't ask me why.
A few things I didn't see: Is FWD a requirement? How about front-engine? A mid-engine rwd c900 with a 2.3L has been done, there are pictures online. You aren't re-inventing the wheel here. Although I don't know why you'd want to use a n/a auto for the conversion, you certainly could.
And how about a transverse motor? A 2.3L c900 isn't actually that difficult if you convert it to transverse. We have seen it done on both c900s and 99s. You install the front clip including all suspension components, etc from a ng900 firewall-forward and re-shell with c900 bodywork. This way everything engine/trans wise bolts up with no problem. You use ng900 suspension, brakes, motor, trans, motor mounts, etc.
Lastly, you said "Saab autobox". Saab didn't make its own automatic transmission for the c900 or newer. Does that mean the three-speed T37 unit, or the Aisin-Warner box from the ng900? The rules are sketchy here. If you used the standard c900 transmission with a custom case, you could lower the gearset past where the crank would hit. Is this allowed? Or by "Saab autobox" do you mean a stock, unmodified unit including the case?
Let me know.
Prove it or GTFO.A bunch of run-on sentences that prove nothing
Yes, "any idiot" could (beard optional), but that wouldn't actually be a 2.3, now would it?!Bingo.
The beard has spoken.
And, any idiot can put a 2.3 valve cover on a 2.0
No, you're saying that YOU did it and many members don't believe you. You've been asked for proof of your "accomplishment" and you have failed to produce any proof.Well, I'm saying that it is possible and that it has been done! Now surely the self-appointed Saab, ASE certified, 25+ year Master mechanics can do something as simply as this basic engine swap...?
You have an hour.You still have not directly addressed any of the questions that are being asked of you.
It is unfortunate that we are bumping heads over this mod (C900 to 2.3 conversion) as I sense a kindred spirit in you, evident by your '70 Charger 500 & '68 Super Bee (are those scoops "stock" or transplanted from a '71 340 Swinger? I can't recall at the moment), the "wheel stander" you previously mentioned?Has it occured to any one else around here that a 2.3NA c900 can not exist? Sure the crank fits in the block but the throw Crashes into the trans case. Sorry Snigel Puss, Your Full of your self and Shit as well. Got any real cars? Like one with a Turbo maybe? You know what saabs are famous for? How about you race that 200mph NG900 you like to brag about?
These are REAL CARS... With Pictures, I even Have videos around here some where..Of REAL CARS. Like these. Not Imaginary ones.
![]()
Why, for the improved torque of course! That and the accompanying HP. Well, that and to prove that it can be done.Why in the eff would you ever care to build a 2.3 n/a auto anyway?? Who gives a shit? Who in their right mind would bother with this 'build'? Its pointless, and stupid.