i dont see anything wrong with it, just a faster way to get some new models out there for everyone.
GM would not be hard to beat.... I am not sure yet about Saab/BMW.... It could be good, but again - have you seen BMW parts pricing? lol They are just as complicated and advanced as Saab once was - but BMW kept going and is leagues ahead of Saab these days in some ways. Either way it's change and change is what Saab has been needing since 2003 just about. I'd like to see another 9000 like car built - a joint venture of 3 different companies building a quality car to share across the board - not to be mistaken for how GM does this.bmw sounds like a much better partner than gm....
Something tells me the Geo is faster, more stylish and get's better MPG's then that... good try thoughYou mean one of these? ;-)
![]()
It's different because it's not Japanese or American... It's still European and it's a hatchback... something we desperately need. I think out of any partners, BMW would be the best to hook up with. They have great chassis, engines, transmissions, etc... As much as I'd love to see a PURE Saab, it's not going to happen for a while. They need to get back on their feet first.Feh. How is this different from the Saaburu or the Trollblazer? It looks like a Mini with a bodykit. I know they need to share with other makes to save on costs, but they need to go their own way as much as possible. Look at the Focus/c30/mazda3. Platform siblings don't have to be clones.
The more i look into it, bmw isn't all that bad, i mean for generic parts the prices are somewhat in line, more advanced components are pretty high, but hey, i guess its the price you pay for the latest tech?GM would not be hard to beat.... I am not sure yet about Saab/BMW.... It could be good, but again - have you seen BMW parts pricing? lol They are just as complicated and advanced as Saab once was - but BMW kept going and is leagues ahead of Saab these days in some ways. Either way it's change and change is what Saab has been needing since 2003 just about. I'd like to see another 9000 like car built - a joint venture of 3 different companies building a quality car to share across the board - not to be mistaken for how GM does this.
I'm hoping the 9-4 turns out to be what it was supposed to be and priced cheaper then predicted. I could see the 9-4 being a replacement for OUR 9-5 if it's as capable.
As for the 9-2 - I think I may be getting past the point of "Geo Metro Sized" toy cars... given the 9-2 would be a nice replacement for the Geo, but I would never be able to justify the cost. I think a Scooter would make a better replacement for my Geo. I'm at a place where I want to get rid of a few cars and get a few more older ones to restore and drive - and get 1 new car for trips (when the 9-5 is a little more worn out)
The point is not who they partner with (although I'd rather see them partner with someone else), but how much it looks like the platform twin. Saab isn't going to do themselves any favors setting themselves up as knock off BMWs. If the NG92 is just a Mini with the ignition in a funny place, Saab will be gone again inside of 10 years. They need something that is distinctively Saab that just happens to share hardware with another car. The renders here are not that different from the Mini that they are based on. They need to take the platform as far from the partners as they can, make it as distinct and Saabish a car as they can get.It's different because it's not Japanese or American... It's still European and it's a hatchback... something we desperately need. I think out of any partners, BMW would be the best to hook up with. They have great chassis, engines, transmissions, etc... As much as I'd love to see a PURE Saab, it's not going to happen for a while. They need to get back on their feet first.